Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 29, 2018 at 20:32 vote accept Felipe
Dec 29, 2018 at 19:51 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 1
Dec 29, 2018 at 19:16 history edited Felipe CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 12 characters in body
Dec 29, 2018 at 19:07 history edited Felipe CC BY-SA 4.0
added 237 characters in body
Dec 28, 2018 at 20:51 comment added Felipe Sure! Maybe I missed something. There is the paper I'm talking about: aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.530700 In the proof of the Theorem 3.4, the author said: The ring R is the coordinate ring of a curve $\Sigma$ of genus $g$ with $n$ points removed. Then he simply claims the Proposition 1.
Dec 28, 2018 at 18:44 comment added dhy Can you give a link to where Proposition 1 appears, to make it clearer what you are asking? As stated, it appears incorrect, unless by "Riemann surface" you really mean "algebraic curve, possibly singular" and you are picking a specific compactification.
Dec 28, 2018 at 15:15 review Close votes
Jan 2, 2019 at 9:31
Dec 28, 2018 at 15:03 comment added Felipe Poles for the rational functions defined in a Riemann surface. For example, $\mathbb{C}[t,t^{-1}]$ have two "allowed poles" in the Riemann sphere: $0$ and $\infty$.
Dec 28, 2018 at 15:01 history edited Felipe CC BY-SA 4.0
added 26 characters in body; edited title
Dec 28, 2018 at 14:57 comment added abx What do you mean by "allowed poles"? Poles of what?
Dec 28, 2018 at 14:34 history asked Felipe CC BY-SA 4.0