Timeline for Divergence of a series related to Schinzel's hypothesis H
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2019 at 17:04 | vote | accept | Liam Eagen | ||
| Dec 25, 2018 at 11:14 | answer | added | Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 22:09 | comment | added | Liam Eagen | Thanks for the reference KConrad. Your paper seems very relevant, I will take a look. | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 21:42 | comment | added | KConrad | The product you call $G(s)$ is essentially the same as the product I wrote as $G(s)$ in my paper linked to in my previous comment. See Definition 30. | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 21:37 | comment | added | KConrad | See math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/articles/hlconst.pdf for an analogue of your question using Dirichlet series instead of a power series in $e^{-t}$ and using products of von Mangoldt functions at polynomial values. I think it is unrealistic to expect anyone has unconditionally proved behavior at $s = 1$ matches what you expect, since that would imply infinitude of the prime values and you know this is still an open problem. (In my paper, the "gap" is Assumption 24.) | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 21:33 | comment | added | Liam Eagen | I am not sure what you mean that the question is posted twice... on my user page it only lists one question. Was the other removed? | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 20:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 21, 2018 at 21:06 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2018 at 20:53 | history | asked | Liam Eagen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |