Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 31, 2021 at 20:51 comment added Thomas On the positive side, there is a morphism from the N=7 Fermat equation to an elliptic curve, namely the quotient by the symmetric group on three elements. This actually provides an extremely nice proof of a symmetric generalization of Fermat for that exponent.
Dec 20, 2018 at 11:17 vote accept YiFan
Dec 20, 2018 at 11:01 answer added François Brunault timeline score: 19
Dec 20, 2018 at 10:08 comment added abx @FrançoisBrunault: I think you should write your comment as an answer, this is actually quite nontrivial. The paper you quote is freely available at https://cms.math.ca/openaccess/cjm/v30/cjm1978v30.1183-1205.pdf.
Dec 20, 2018 at 9:38 comment added François Brunault I don't know the answer to the question but here is a reference: Koblitz, Rohrlich, Simple factors in the Jacobian of a Fermat curve. If I understand Theorem 2 correctly, then if $N \geq 5$ is a prime $\equiv 2 \textrm{ mod } 3$ then the simple factors of the Jacobian of $X_N$ all have dimension $(N-1)/2$. So for exemple $X_5$ and $X_{11}$ do not map to any elliptic curve.
Dec 20, 2018 at 9:24 comment added François Brunault The Jacobian of the Fermat curve decomposes (up to isogeny) as a product of CM abelian varieties. Accordingly the motive of the Fermat curve $X_N$ decomposes as a direct sum of motives associated to Hecke characters of the cyclotomic field $\mathbf{Q}(\zeta_N)$ (see Otsubo's work e.g. On special values of Jacobi-sum Hecke $L$-functions). So your question is about rationality properties of these Hecke characters.
Dec 20, 2018 at 7:25 comment added abx @Sándor Kovács: Oops, you are absolutely right. I misunderstood the question.
Dec 20, 2018 at 7:12 comment added Sándor Kovács @abx I think you reversed something in your argument. Here is an analog: A given curve can only dominate a finite number of smooth rational curves (aka a $\mathbb P^1$), so according to your argument there are only a countable set of curves altogether, since every curve dominates a $\mathbb P^1$. $\smile$
Dec 20, 2018 at 7:10 review Close votes
Dec 20, 2018 at 12:44
Dec 20, 2018 at 5:21 comment added abx A given curve can only dominate a finite number of elliptic curves. So the elliptic curves dominated by some Fermat curve form a countable set.
Dec 20, 2018 at 3:00 comment added Joe Silverman The cubic Fermat curve is a smooth cubic in $\mathbb P^2$, so has genus 1. It has the rational point $[1,-1,0]$. Hence it is isomorphic to an elliptic curve given by a Weierstrass equation. Finding the transformation is standard. The quartic Fermat curve maps 2-to-1 to the curve $C:u^4+1=v^2$ via $u=x/y$ and $v=z^2/y$. The curve $C$ also has genus 1 and a rational point $(u,v)=(0,1)$, hence it too can be mapped to an elliptic curve in Weierstrass form (using 19th century formulas!) . For higher $n$, there are lower genus curves that the Fermat curve maps to, but they're generally not elliptic.
Dec 20, 2018 at 2:54 comment added Joe Silverman @AdamP.Goucher The OP is asking for a morphism from the Fermat curve onto an elliptic curve, not an isomorphism. Equivalently, does the Jacobian of the Fermat curve have an elliptic factor?
Dec 20, 2018 at 1:04 comment added Adam P. Goucher Unless I'm missing something, higher-degree Fermat curves have genus greater than 1, which means that they're not birationally equivalent to elliptic curves.
Dec 20, 2018 at 0:40 review First posts
Dec 20, 2018 at 1:48
Dec 20, 2018 at 0:39 history asked YiFan CC BY-SA 4.0