Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 27, 2020 at 12:08 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 27, 2020 at 11:01 answer added Nick L timeline score: 1
Dec 19, 2018 at 22:28 comment added Nick L That would be great! I think the paper "cubic forms and compex 3-folds" by Okonek and Van de Ven is also a nice source for these things. If by chance one of these 3-folds had $b_{2}=1$ then there would be only finite number of possibilities to check since the rational 3-fold would be Fano.
Dec 19, 2018 at 22:02 comment added Jason Starr Presumably topologists are well-aware of the following, but I just learned of the Manifold Atlas Project. There is a wonderful page about simply connected 6-manifolds and a complete list of homeomorphism invariants: map.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/6-manifolds:_1-connected I will try to see if the simply connected examples from the following answer might be homeomorphic to rational 3folds: mathoverflow.net/questions/318990/…
Dec 18, 2018 at 23:43 comment added Enrico For sure all $h^{p,0}$ are birational invariants. I am not how to prove the full statement though
Dec 18, 2018 at 16:02 comment added Nick L @ Enrico, thanks, how do you show that the homeomorphism preserves Hodge numbers? It will be true that $h^{1,0}=0$ since rational $3$-folds are simply connected, but I am not sure about $h^{2,0},h^{3,0}$.
Dec 18, 2018 at 14:29 comment added Dmitri Panov Maybe it's worth to ask the authors of arxiv.org/abs/1606.09237 ...
Dec 18, 2018 at 10:42 comment added Enrico To the best of my knowledge, I do not remember any smooth threefold of general type with $h^{1,0}=h^{2,0}=h^{3,0}=0$. However, if you allow basically harmless (e.g. quotient) singularities you can find examples of canonically polarised threefolds where $|-K|$ is empty (and the other hodge number vanishes as well by Lefschetz). Go to grdb.co.uk/search/gt3 and simply pick the threefold where no ambient weight is equal to 1. (of course this is just a necessary condition, far from sufficient)
Dec 17, 2018 at 19:44 history edited Nick L CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Dec 17, 2018 at 19:33 history asked Nick L CC BY-SA 4.0