Timeline for Are there other nice math books close to the style of Tristan Needham?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
55 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 21 at 13:27 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 28 at 17:07 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 5 at 3:07 | |||||
Jan 28 at 15:49 | answer | added | Adams | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 20, 2023 at 11:07 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 2 | |
May 14, 2023 at 17:22 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 29, 2023 at 1:16 | answer | added | Daniel Asimov | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 29, 2023 at 0:32 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 10, 2022 at 17:01 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 1, 2022 at 20:52 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 26, 2022 at 14:57 | answer | added | PrimeRibeyeDeal | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 28, 2022 at 13:43 | answer | added | Simon Eatwell | timeline score: 6 | |
Nov 7, 2021 at 17:17 | answer | added | Timothy Chow | timeline score: 7 | |
Jun 6, 2020 at 5:25 | answer | added | mikhailfranco | timeline score: 28 | |
May 3, 2020 at 11:11 | answer | added | user27182 | timeline score: 7 | |
May 3, 2020 at 11:02 | answer | added | Shahrooz | timeline score: 2 | |
May 3, 2020 at 8:20 | answer | added | user36418 | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 2, 2017 at 14:53 | answer | added | Helmer.Aslaksen | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 7, 2016 at 11:23 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited Google Books link
|
Aug 26, 2014 at 21:53 | answer | added | user44641 | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 16, 2014 at 18:00 | answer | added | Pait | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 25, 2013 at 6:54 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 25, 2013 at 18:46 | |||||
Dec 24, 2013 at 20:21 | answer | added | user44641 | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 11, 2013 at 14:20 | answer | added | Alfred Inselberg | timeline score: 6 | |
Nov 10, 2012 at 7:04 | answer | added | quarkiness | timeline score: 8 | |
Jul 20, 2012 at 3:32 | answer | added | Tom Copeland | timeline score: 9 | |
May 24, 2012 at 7:10 | answer | added | Stuart Ramsden | timeline score: 4 | |
May 23, 2011 at 7:12 | answer | added | Selene Routley | timeline score: 20 | |
May 23, 2011 at 5:42 | answer | added | fcukier | timeline score: 6 | |
May 22, 2011 at 18:49 | answer | added | isomorphismes | timeline score: 13 | |
Nov 20, 2010 at 11:57 | answer | added | J W | timeline score: 12 | |
Jul 16, 2010 at 17:53 | answer | added | Adrian Petrescu | timeline score: 11 | |
Jul 16, 2010 at 17:44 | answer | added | Adrian Barquero-Sanchez | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 16, 2010 at 16:21 | answer | added | Per Vognsen | timeline score: 15 | |
Jul 16, 2010 at 12:22 | history | edited | Andrey Rekalo |
Tag added
|
|
Jul 16, 2010 at 2:07 | answer | added | Rune | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 19:35 | comment | added | The Mathemagician | @Davidac897 Both,ideally.A student struggling with a more rigorous presentation-such as Alfhors or Narisham-will benefit tremendously from the geometric and historical presentation of the basics and drawing connections between them. A student who has mastered a rigorous presentation will gain much deeper insight into what the abstract construction "means". | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 14:38 | answer | added | Hans Lundmark | timeline score: 13 | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 10:36 | comment | added | David Corwin | @Andrew L: Does that mean that Needham's text is useful for the student who has not yet understood the rigorous formalism of complex analysis and wants to understand it? Or should a student who already understands complex analysis reasonable well still read Needham's book? | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 9:52 | answer | added | David Corwin | timeline score: 9 | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 2:14 | answer | added | SandeepJ | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 15, 2010 at 1:04 | answer | added | Victor Protsak | timeline score: 22 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 22:32 | comment | added | The Mathemagician | @danseetea The similarity between the texts of Stillwell and Needham's masterwork is indeed striking and is not an accident:Professor Stillwell is acknowledged in the introduction to Needham's book as a strong influence on the style of the text. We can all learn a great deal from Professor Stillwell's texts,emphasizing the historical development of the great edifice of mathematics. | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 21:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Marco Disce | ||
Jul 14, 2010 at 20:12 | answer | added | L J | timeline score: 54 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:51 | answer | added | GM Hurley | timeline score: 28 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:22 | comment | added | danseetea | On one hand I want to +1 because that's indeed a great book. On the other hand I should probably -1 because it's a bad question (well, at least as long as it's phrased the way it is and since it's not community-wiki). So I'll do neither for now. I'll just leave this comment: while many books come to mind, one particular author who has a style similar to that of Needham's (that is, his books are full of intuition and historical insight) is John Stillwell. I'm not going to recommend a particular book because most of them are great (I say 'most' and not 'all' because I haven't read them all). | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:11 | comment | added | The Mathemagician | You SHOULD be impressed,Marco. It's a truly remarkable book that should be read by anyone seriously interested in analysis or physics,particularly for it's historical insight. | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:52 | answer | added | Dan Ramras | timeline score: 13 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:49 | answer | added | PeterR | timeline score: 10 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:22 | answer | added | John D. Cook | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:22 | answer | added | Pratik Deoghare | timeline score: 22 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:10 | answer | added | Joseph O'Rourke | timeline score: 29 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:10 | answer | added | Andrey Rekalo | timeline score: 23 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:05 | answer | added | Noah Snyder | timeline score: 16 | |
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:02 | history | asked | Marco Disce | CC BY-SA 2.5 |