Skip to main content
55 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 21 at 13:27 answer added Brian timeline score: 0
Jan 28 at 17:07 review Close votes
Feb 5 at 3:07
Jan 28 at 15:49 answer added Adams timeline score: 1
Jun 20, 2023 at 11:07 answer added Brian timeline score: 2
May 14, 2023 at 17:22 answer added Brian timeline score: 2
Apr 29, 2023 at 1:16 answer added Daniel Asimov timeline score: 2
Apr 29, 2023 at 0:32 answer added Brian timeline score: 5
Nov 10, 2022 at 17:01 answer added Brian timeline score: 4
Jun 1, 2022 at 20:52 answer added Brian timeline score: 1
Apr 26, 2022 at 14:57 answer added PrimeRibeyeDeal timeline score: 4
Feb 28, 2022 at 13:43 answer added Simon Eatwell timeline score: 6
Nov 7, 2021 at 17:17 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 7
Jun 6, 2020 at 5:25 answer added mikhailfranco timeline score: 28
May 3, 2020 at 11:11 answer added user27182 timeline score: 7
May 3, 2020 at 11:02 answer added Shahrooz timeline score: 2
May 3, 2020 at 8:20 answer added user36418 timeline score: 1
Apr 2, 2017 at 14:53 answer added Helmer.Aslaksen timeline score: 5
Jul 7, 2016 at 11:23 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
edited Google Books link
Aug 26, 2014 at 21:53 answer added user44641 timeline score: 0
Jan 16, 2014 at 18:00 answer added Pait timeline score: 5
Dec 25, 2013 at 6:54 review Close votes
Dec 25, 2013 at 18:46
Dec 24, 2013 at 20:21 answer added user44641 timeline score: 4
Feb 11, 2013 at 14:20 answer added Alfred Inselberg timeline score: 6
Nov 10, 2012 at 7:04 answer added quarkiness timeline score: 8
Jul 20, 2012 at 3:32 answer added Tom Copeland timeline score: 9
May 24, 2012 at 7:10 answer added Stuart Ramsden timeline score: 4
May 23, 2011 at 7:12 answer added Selene Routley timeline score: 20
May 23, 2011 at 5:42 answer added fcukier timeline score: 6
May 22, 2011 at 18:49 answer added isomorphismes timeline score: 13
Nov 20, 2010 at 11:57 answer added J W timeline score: 12
Jul 16, 2010 at 17:53 answer added Adrian Petrescu timeline score: 11
Jul 16, 2010 at 17:44 answer added Adrian Barquero-Sanchez timeline score: 4
Jul 16, 2010 at 16:21 answer added Per Vognsen timeline score: 15
Jul 16, 2010 at 12:22 history edited Andrey Rekalo
Tag added
Jul 16, 2010 at 2:07 answer added Rune timeline score: 2
Jul 15, 2010 at 19:35 comment added The Mathemagician @Davidac897 Both,ideally.A student struggling with a more rigorous presentation-such as Alfhors or Narisham-will benefit tremendously from the geometric and historical presentation of the basics and drawing connections between them. A student who has mastered a rigorous presentation will gain much deeper insight into what the abstract construction "means".
Jul 15, 2010 at 14:38 answer added Hans Lundmark timeline score: 13
Jul 15, 2010 at 10:36 comment added David Corwin @Andrew L: Does that mean that Needham's text is useful for the student who has not yet understood the rigorous formalism of complex analysis and wants to understand it? Or should a student who already understands complex analysis reasonable well still read Needham's book?
Jul 15, 2010 at 9:52 answer added David Corwin timeline score: 9
Jul 15, 2010 at 2:14 answer added SandeepJ timeline score: 4
Jul 15, 2010 at 1:04 answer added Victor Protsak timeline score: 22
Jul 14, 2010 at 22:32 comment added The Mathemagician @danseetea The similarity between the texts of Stillwell and Needham's masterwork is indeed striking and is not an accident:Professor Stillwell is acknowledged in the introduction to Needham's book as a strong influence on the style of the text. We can all learn a great deal from Professor Stillwell's texts,emphasizing the historical development of the great edifice of mathematics.
Jul 14, 2010 at 21:10 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Marco Disce
Jul 14, 2010 at 20:12 answer added L J timeline score: 54
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:51 answer added GM Hurley timeline score: 28
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:22 comment added danseetea On one hand I want to +1 because that's indeed a great book. On the other hand I should probably -1 because it's a bad question (well, at least as long as it's phrased the way it is and since it's not community-wiki). So I'll do neither for now. I'll just leave this comment: while many books come to mind, one particular author who has a style similar to that of Needham's (that is, his books are full of intuition and historical insight) is John Stillwell. I'm not going to recommend a particular book because most of them are great (I say 'most' and not 'all' because I haven't read them all).
Jul 14, 2010 at 19:11 comment added The Mathemagician You SHOULD be impressed,Marco. It's a truly remarkable book that should be read by anyone seriously interested in analysis or physics,particularly for it's historical insight.
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:52 answer added Dan Ramras timeline score: 13
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:49 answer added PeterR timeline score: 10
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:22 answer added John D. Cook timeline score: 6
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:22 answer added Pratik Deoghare timeline score: 22
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:10 answer added Joseph O'Rourke timeline score: 29
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:10 answer added Andrey Rekalo timeline score: 23
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:05 answer added Noah Snyder timeline score: 16
Jul 14, 2010 at 18:02 history asked Marco Disce CC BY-SA 2.5