Timeline for Monodromy groups of families of abelian varieties: a reference request
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2018 at 12:28 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 4, 2018 at 11:33 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 10:00 | answer | added | Sebastian Petersen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | JSE | BCnrd, that is what we think, but wanted to save ourselves the peu plus attention if someone has already written the appendix for us. Will report back. | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 21:54 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | I find it likely that a proof can be given by the sort of arguments BCnrd mentions above. However, I would also be interested in seeing the details. | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 21:23 | comment | added | BCnrd | Anweshi, it's item 137 in volume IV of Serre's Oeuvres, near which are other letters too. JSE, is it just a matter of look at the proofs and applying more general "spreading out" and Chebotarev arguments with Faltings' generalization of Mordell-stuff to finitely generated ground fields (in char. 0)? If so, probably there's no reference, so you should write one as an appendix if you need it for a paper. Or should I write one for you (maybe an exercise as part of the Mordell seminar with AV next year...)? | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 21:05 | history | edited | BCnrd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Jul 13, 2010 at 20:04 | comment | added | Anweshi | I always wonder how these private "letters" circulate on to the possession of a large number of people. This time I must try to find an answer. How did it reach your hands? :D | |
| Jul 13, 2010 at 19:40 | history | asked | JSE | CC BY-SA 2.5 |