Timeline for Conceptual explanation for curious linear-algebra fact in characteristic $2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 13, 2018 at 20:38 | vote | accept | Alice | ||
Dec 13, 2018 at 1:35 | comment | added | David E Speyer | @user44191 It's a nontrivial extension, not a direct sum. The diagonal zero symmetric matrices are a subspace and the "diagonal only" are a quotient. | |
Dec 12, 2018 at 23:59 | comment | added | spin | Perhaps it is better to express this in terms of vector spaces: $X$ corresponds to a symmetric bilinear form $b$ on a vector space $V$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$, and $X_0$ corresponds to the linear map $v \mapsto b(v,v)$. Further $A^tXA$ corresponds to the bilinear form $b'$ defined by $b'(v,w) = b(Av, Aw)$, with the associated linear map $v \mapsto b'(v,v)$ etc. Looking at it this way, the equality seems clear. | |
Dec 12, 2018 at 23:44 | answer | added | dhy | timeline score: 6 | |
Dec 12, 2018 at 23:27 | history | edited | user44191 |
Retagged to the specific characteristic, added rt for reasons explained in comment
|
|
Dec 12, 2018 at 23:27 | comment | added | user44191 | This likely can be seen as a statement about the representation theory of $G = SL_n(\mathbb{F}_2)$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$. If $\rho$ is the obvious representation, then this says that the symmetric component of $\rho \otimes \rho^t$ further decomposes to a diagonal-only component and a zero-diagonal component. | |
Dec 12, 2018 at 22:10 | history | edited | Alice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 12, 2018 at 21:40 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 12, 2018 at 21:48 | |||||
Dec 12, 2018 at 21:37 | history | asked | Alice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |