Timeline for Is the p-adic Lindemann-Weierstrass Conjecture still open?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2023 at 15:53 | comment | added | joaopa | @mcs-> Did you publish your proof? | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 20:54 | comment | added | MCS | (continued) 1) (Already known): certain zeroes of power series over a complete non-archimedean field are algebraic over said field. 2) (I had to prove it): a non-trivial linear combination of algebraic translates of the Iwasawa logarithm is never analytic at the point at infinity of the complex p-adic numbers. | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 20:54 | comment | added | MCS | Yes, they are distinct. I've fixed that. :) @CarloBeenakker: Call me crazy (I probably am), but I think I might have made a breakthrough on the problem. I've gone through my proof line-by-line several times over already, and nothing is out of place. To give a hint of what I'm doing, the argument hinges on two propositions: | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 20:42 | vote | accept | MCS | ||
| Dec 13, 2018 at 20:42 | history | edited | MCS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2018 at 19:13 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I suippose that $\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_N$ are meant to be distinct. Or maybe linearly independent over the rationals. | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 21:55 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | The question does not ask for advise, but I wonder whether it is advisable to choose for a Ph.D. project a problem that for a decade has resisted solution by experts. | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 21:47 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 14 | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 21:10 | history | asked | MCS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |