Timeline for What is currently feasible in invariant theory for binary forms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2018 at 17:53 | comment | added | Leox | I have only the answer to the last part of the question regarding the Maple package. To calculate invariants of degree greater than 18 just need to open the .mpl-file and replace 18 by your degree. But then the program can work slower. Also I'm not sure if someone needs such invariants. It is why I have bounded by 18. | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 16:34 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to attack your answer. You don’t need to delete your answer. You have information about the original question, and I, and many others, would like to learn and understand it. | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 7:07 | comment | added | Leox | OK, I will delete my answer. | |
| Dec 13, 2018 at 7:01 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | 1. Well, I figured out that "the link... works" is referring to the original question, where a link used to not work, but now it works. It would make sense to update the original question to delete "And that link no longer works." So you are right, the link works. 2. Why did you make a link to your homepage? Does your homepage contain more information about the original question? Can you please explain which part of your homepage has an answer to the question? 3. What is the "small correction"? Can you please explain that? | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 14:05 | comment | added | Leox | Explane what?... | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 11:24 | comment | added | Zach Teitler | Please explain! | |
| Dec 11, 2018 at 22:15 | history | edited | Leox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
| Dec 11, 2018 at 22:10 | history | answered | Leox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |