Timeline for Hodge numbers of compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2018 at 5:48 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added comments on torsion canonical bundle
|
| Dec 11, 2018 at 5:45 | comment | added | Ben McKay | @MartindeBorbon: ok, up to finite covering then. I will edit the answer again. | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 21:57 | comment | added | Martin de Borbon | Closed Ricci flat does not imply trivial canonical bundle. A product of an Enriques surface with an elliptic curve has no l holomorphic volume from | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 18:31 | vote | accept | geometer | ||
| Dec 10, 2018 at 17:44 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added Beauville reference
|
| Dec 10, 2018 at 17:37 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted h20, added product possibilities
|
| Dec 10, 2018 at 17:30 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted h20
|
| Dec 10, 2018 at 17:30 | comment | added | Ben McKay | Ok, I didn't read carefully enough. I will edit. | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 17:21 | comment | added | geometer | if I understand correctly, your first paragraph answers the first question (we have to have $h^{n, 0}=1$). But your second paragraph I don't quite understand. We require from the outset that $h^{2, 0}=0$ and ask if some other $h^{p, 0}$ can be non-zero (excluding $p=0, n$). | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 16:59 | history | answered | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |