Skip to main content
added comments on torsion canonical bundle
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

YouAfter replacing by a finite covering space, you must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. By a theorem of Beauville (J.D.G. 1983), after a finite covering, you have a product of simply connected Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and a flat complex torus. But to have $h^{20}=0$, that torus is an elliptic curve.

As Martin de Borbon points out, there are examples of closed complex manifolds with Ricci flat Kaehler metrics with torsion canonical bundle, and then you will get $h^{n0}=0$, but after taking a finite covering space you get $h^{n0}=1$.

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. By a theorem of Beauville (J.D.G. 1983), after a finite covering, you have a product of simply connected Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and a flat complex torus. But to have $h^{20}=0$, that torus is an elliptic curve.

After replacing by a finite covering space, you must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. By a theorem of Beauville (J.D.G. 1983), after a finite covering, you have a product of simply connected Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and a flat complex torus. But to have $h^{20}=0$, that torus is an elliptic curve.

As Martin de Borbon points out, there are examples of closed complex manifolds with Ricci flat Kaehler metrics with torsion canonical bundle, and then you will get $h^{n0}=0$, but after taking a finite covering space you get $h^{n0}=1$.

added Beauville reference
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. I think you can also prove thatBy a theorem of Beauville (J.D.G. 1983), after a finite covering, you have a product of simply connected Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and at most onea flat complex torus. But to have $h^{20}=0$, that torus is an elliptic curve.

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. I think you can also prove that, after a finite covering, you have a product of Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and at most one elliptic curve.

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. By a theorem of Beauville (J.D.G. 1983), after a finite covering, you have a product of simply connected Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and a flat complex torus. But to have $h^{20}=0$, that torus is an elliptic curve.

deleted h20, added product possibilities
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. I think you can also prove that, after a finite covering, you have a product of Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and at most one elliptic curve.

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

You must have $h^{n0}=1$, because you have a parallel volume form, so nowhere zero, and any other holomorphic volume form is a holomorphic multiple, so a constant multiple (as holomorphic functions are constant).

Kobayashi, First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields, 1980, proved that any holomorphic tensor on a compact Ricci-flat Kaehler manifold is parallel. Hence it induces a reduction of holonomy group. The holonomy group is a product of groups arising as irreducible holonomy groups, i.e. copies of the special unitary group $SU(n_i)$ and the compact symplectic group $Sp(n_j)$. But since you have $h^{20}=0$, you have no $Sp(n_j)$ factors, so a product of $SU(n_i)$ factors, i.e. locally a product of Calabi-Yau and flat Kaeher metrics. Unless there is a flat factor in the product, you don't get any parallel tensors except for the holomorphic $n_j$-forms. I think you can also prove that, after a finite covering, you have a product of Calabi Yaus with irreducible $SU(n_i)$ holonomy, $n_i\ge 3$, and at most one elliptic curve.

deleted h20
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102
Loading
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102
Loading