Timeline for sums of rational squares
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2018 at 6:49 | comment | added | supriya saha | Thank you very much for pointing out gcd(w,p)=1. From gcd(c,d)=1, gcd(c^{2},d^{2)=1. Thus, we can say k does not divide $c^{2}$ as $d^{2}=kb^{2}$. Then k=1 as it must give integer in the right-hand side. But your method is much better. | |
Dec 8, 2018 at 6:20 | history | edited | supriya saha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:51 | comment | added | user44191 | Welcome to MathOverflow. I've edited your post to make clear the question you are answering. You may want to make clear that $gcd(w, p) = 1$ (as otherwise, $3^2 + 0 = 3*3$ is a counterexample to your statement). I'm not sure I understand your proof that $k = 1$; isn't it enough to show that $b^2 | d^2$ and $d^2 | b^2$? Further, you need that $gcd(a^2, b^2) = 1$ to show $b^2 | d^2$. | |
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:47 | history | edited | user44191 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarifying the question being answered
|
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:45 | review | Late answers | |||
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:51 | |||||
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:30 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 7, 2018 at 20:33 | |||||
Dec 7, 2018 at 19:29 | history | answered | supriya saha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |