Timeline for Reference of generalized isometries
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2018 at 22:34 | comment | added | ABIM | @PiotrHajlasz hmmm I took some time to think about that, and its true; very interesting point! | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 14:52 | comment | added | Piotr Hajlasz | I am not convinced. The definition lacks certain homogeneity. If $\Phi$ satisfies it, then it is not clear that $\Phi_v=\Phi+v$ ($v$-constant vector) satisfies it. There are many conditions that are satisfied by isometries and not every such condition is forth studying. You need a deeper motivation than just the fact isometries satisfy it. | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 14:47 | comment | added | ABIM | Yes it is near isometric | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 14:46 | comment | added | Piotr Hajlasz | This is not clear to me why such a class of diffeomorphisms should be interesting. Any motivation supporting the definition of this class? | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 11:19 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 6, 2018 at 11:01 | history | asked | ABIM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |