Timeline for Fundamental solution of an elliptic PDE in divergence form with non-symmetric matrix
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2021 at 16:23 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
While this is on the front page, capitalise title; name of paper; Springer -> DOI
|
| S Dec 12, 2018 at 14:28 | history | bounty ended | Sepideh Bakhoda | ||
| S Dec 12, 2018 at 14:28 | history | notice removed | Sepideh Bakhoda | ||
| Dec 12, 2018 at 14:28 | vote | accept | Sepideh Bakhoda | ||
| S Dec 12, 2018 at 11:08 | history | suggested | leo monsaingeon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
emphasized that the coeficients $a_{ij}(x)$ can be non constate, this was a source of confusion i nthe comments
|
| Dec 12, 2018 at 10:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 12, 2018 at 11:08 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2018 at 22:23 | answer | added | Daniele Tampieri | timeline score: 19 | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 16:03 | answer | added | Bazin | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 21:14 | answer | added | Deane Yang | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 18:31 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
added a top-level tag; https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1457/why-are-mo-tags-formatted-as-they-are
|
|
| S Dec 6, 2018 at 18:17 | history | bounty started | Sepideh Bakhoda | ||
| S Dec 6, 2018 at 18:17 | history | notice added | Sepideh Bakhoda | Draw attention | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 18:36 | comment | added | user126920 | Ah, sorry, I didn't follow the link in your question, so I thought we were in the constant-coefficient case. | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 18:15 | comment | added | Sepideh Bakhoda | @StanleySnelson Since $a^{ij}$ are not constants your statement is not true. Actually I have seen that question, the comment by Deane Yang was for an earlier version of the question. See edit 6 here: mathoverflow.net/posts/135761/revisions For the equation in divergence form, you cannot replace A by its symmetric part. | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 18:11 | comment | added | user126920 | Similar to this question, one can write $a^{ij}$ as a symmetric part plus an anti-symmetric part, and because $\partial_{ij} u = \partial_{ji} u$, the anti-symmetric part cancels out of the equation. | |
| Dec 4, 2018 at 14:51 | history | asked | Sepideh Bakhoda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |