Skip to main content
corrected spelling
Source Link

I think this is only because you don't care dividing by zero. But you may as well define the value at zero to be 0, and any other value at least 1. See this expository paper by Keith Conrad for interesting remmarksremarks on euclidean domains and functions.

I think this is only because you don't care dividing by zero. But you may as well define the value at zero to be 0, and any other value at least 1. See this expository paper by Keith Conrad for interesting remmarks on euclidean domains and functions.

I think this is only because you don't care dividing by zero. But you may as well define the value at zero to be 0, and any other value at least 1. See this expository paper by Keith Conrad for interesting remarks on euclidean domains and functions.

Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
BS.
  • 9.4k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 49

I think this is only because you don't care dividing by zero. But you may as well define the value at zero to be 0, and any other value at least 1. See this expository paper by Keith Conrad for interesting remmarks on euclidean domains and functions.