Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 20, 2019 at 22:40 review Reopen votes
Apr 20, 2019 at 22:58
Dec 3, 2018 at 10:39 vote accept Joseph O'Rourke
Dec 3, 2018 at 3:17 history closed Gerald Edgar
Victor Protsak
Andrés E. Caicedo
Boris Bukh
Andy Putman
Opinion-based
Dec 3, 2018 at 2:26 answer added Nik Weaver timeline score: 4
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:50 comment added Todd Trimble I thought I read somewhere a traditional formula: the science of number and space (which I think has resonances going back to ancient Greece: the quaternity "arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy" seems very suggestive). Then there's Thurston, who seems more modern: “the theory of formal patterns” (see his essay "Proof and Progress..."). But permit me to remind that MO is not well-adapted to discussion-y questions, interesting though this one could be for a discussion. [IMHO Weyl's description sounds much too limited.]
Dec 3, 2018 at 0:58 comment added Tom Copeland So the underlying question in the light of other MO Qs you've asked is perhaps to what extent can continuum methods be legitimately supplanted by discrete methods--a reversal of the historical evolution of the calculus?
Dec 3, 2018 at 0:10 review Close votes
Dec 3, 2018 at 3:20
Dec 3, 2018 at 0:02 comment added Gerald Edgar Voted to close... Primarily opinion-based. If we do this one, then we could ask about "Mathematics: The Science of Patterns" (Keith Devlin), and then "What is Mathematics?" (Courant & Robbins), and then "What is Mathematics Really?" (Reuben Hersch). So ... this is not a topic for a question here. Perhaps requesting references about "what is mathematics" may be OK.
Dec 2, 2018 at 23:42 history asked Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 4.0