Timeline for What is the current status on the corank conjecture for Selmer groups?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2019 at 9:05 | comment | added | David Loeffler | Laurent Berger, "Representations de de Rham et normes universelles", Bull. Soc. Math. France 133 (2005), no. 4, 601--618. | |
| May 11, 2019 at 5:50 | comment | added | user130124 | @DavidLoeffler I would like to understand Berger's argument (which I may have to adapt in a certain situation) where may I find this result? | |
| Nov 18, 2018 at 19:01 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 79 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2018 at 18:56 | comment | added | David Loeffler | You should ask that as a new question. | |
| Nov 18, 2018 at 18:52 | comment | added | user130124 | Thanks David, the conjecture as stated is for a general number field, I wonder what the expected corank should be for the anticyclotomic and split prime $\mathbb{Z}_p$ extensions over an imaginary quadratic field $K$ in which $p$ splits into $\mathfrak{p}\mathfrak{p}^*$? The split prime $\mathbb{Z}_p$ extension at $\mathfrak{p}$ is the $\mathbb{Z}_p$ extension of $K$ ramified only at $\mathfrak{p}$. | |
| Nov 18, 2018 at 18:08 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 18, 2018 at 17:52 | history | edited | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 289 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2018 at 14:26 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | .. and it looks like it might even work for $p=2$ :) | |
| Nov 18, 2018 at 12:30 | history | answered | David Loeffler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |