Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 14 at 12:45 answer added Hodge-Tate timeline score: 3
Sep 14 at 9:03 comment added Paul Broussous @Hodge-Tate Thank you very much for this reference! May be you should post it as an answer?
Nov 14, 2018 at 17:03 comment added Paul Broussous @paulgarrett I made my question more precise.
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:48 comment added Paul Broussous @LSpice Thanks, you're right. I made the correction.
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:46 history edited Paul Broussous CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:44 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Minor notation smoothing
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:41 comment added LSpice Also, in your last line, do you really mean to ask just for $\mu(P)$, or (as the rest of your question suggests) for $\mu(P w P)$ for a certain element $w$?
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:40 comment added LSpice @paulgarrett, Casselman gives a distinguished choice of representatives for the double cosets you describe in Proposition 1.1.3 of the p-adic notes; for example, one can take the minimal-length elements in each coset. (I guess that doesn't make it terribly easy to count them.)
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:21 history edited Paul Broussous CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1818 characters in body
Nov 14, 2018 at 16:21 comment added Paul Broussous @paulgarrett Indeed I'm looking for closed formulas in particular cases.
Nov 13, 2018 at 22:54 comment added paul garrett ... but/and do you need more than that sort of pseudo-algorithmic description?
Nov 13, 2018 at 22:50 comment added paul garrett I suppose you know as well as I that the cell multiplication rule(s), $BwB\cdot BsB = BwsB$ for length $ws$ greater than that of $w$, and with an addition term $\sqcup BwB$ when $ws$ is not longer, and the Bruhat decomposition of each $P$, give some sort of description of the volume/index. Likewise, I'd bet you know that $P\backslash G/Q\approx W_P\backslash W/W_Q$ for "parabolics/parahorics" $P,Q$, so the issue of systematic description partly devolves into existence of a "nice" choice of reps for $W_P\backslash W/W_Q$... which I do not know, and don't off-hand know a reference for.
Nov 13, 2018 at 19:56 comment added paul garrett Indeed... But I figured that it's better to use the less ambiguous term, especially since you already had it in your title.
Nov 13, 2018 at 19:54 comment added Paul Broussous @paulgarrett Of course you're right! I corrected my mistake. Somehow a parahoric is a parabolic of a certain Tits system ...
Nov 13, 2018 at 19:50 history edited Paul Broussous CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Nov 13, 2018 at 18:57 comment added paul garrett I gather you mean that $P$ is (most precisely) a parahoric, not parabolic, as in your title?
Nov 13, 2018 at 15:18 comment added Paul Broussous I realized that there is no tag for "Tits systems" or "BN-pairs".
Nov 13, 2018 at 15:13 history asked Paul Broussous CC BY-SA 4.0