Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 1, 2023 at 13:54 vote accept D_S
Aug 19, 2023 at 18:40 answer added LSpice timeline score: 2
Aug 19, 2023 at 7:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 21, 2023 at 6:07 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 22, 2022 at 6:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 24, 2022 at 5:05 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 26, 2022 at 5:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 27, 2021 at 4:06 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 29, 2021 at 4:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 1, 2021 at 2:33 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 1, 2021 at 2:04 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 3, 2020 at 2:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 6, 2020 at 2:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 7, 2020 at 1:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 9, 2019 at 0:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 11, 2019 at 23:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 11, 2019 at 23:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 12, 2018 at 23:01 history edited Michael Hardy CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 23 characters in body; edited title
Dec 12, 2018 at 16:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Nov 14, 2018 at 15:38 comment added LSpice (In fact, I see that you have already discussed this analogue of the big cell at another question.)
Nov 14, 2018 at 15:37 comment added LSpice (original) In particular, it can be used to compute dimensions. In fact, it can maybe be leveraged to understand the structure of the general quotient in a way reminiscent of the proof of existence of a reductive group with a given root datum; I don't know. Anyway, I will think further about your question about existence of rational points.
Nov 14, 2018 at 15:36 comment added LSpice (Commenting here rather than on my answer because it's wrong and I'll eventually delete it.) As you mention, the direct-product decomposition Casselman claims on p. 12 can fail, but nonetheless it is true that the natural map $\prod N_\alpha \to P_\Theta\backslash P_\Theta w P_\Omega$ is an embedding with open image. (This is some sort of general-parabolic analogue of the 'big cell'.) (rest)
Nov 12, 2018 at 15:40 comment added LSpice The choice of representative only conjugates the embedding $w^{-1}P_\theta w \cap P_\Omega \to P_\Omega$, hence cannot change parabolic-ness. I agree with you that the fixed-point theorem doesn't seem to say anything about cohomology; I was conflating it with the statement that $(G/P)(k) = G(k)/P(k)$, the latter of which may (I'm not sure) most easily be proven using a Bruhat-type decomposition and the fact about lifting of rational points that is the subject of your question!
Nov 10, 2018 at 21:38 comment added D_S By the way, how can you get the injectivity of $H^1(k,P) \rightarrow H^1(k,G)$ from the Borel fixed point theorem?
Nov 10, 2018 at 21:07 comment added D_S Maybe it is not true for general $w$? But Casselman does make a canonical choice of representative $w_0$ for $W_{\theta} w W_{\Omega}$, namely the unique one of minimal length. Maybe in this case $w_0^{-1}P_{\theta}w_0 \cap P_{\Omega}$ is parabolic.
Nov 9, 2018 at 17:18 comment added LSpice I think that it's a consequence of Borel's fixed-point theorem that the map $\mathrm H^1(k, P) \to \mathrm H^1(k, G)$ always has trivial fibres for $P$ a parabolic subgroup of $G$. However, $w^{-1}P_\theta w \cap P_\Omega$ isn't necessarily a parabolic subgroup of $P_\Omega$, so I can't see how to use that here.
Nov 9, 2018 at 17:15 comment added LSpice Proposition 6.6 of Borel discusses general quotients of this shape. As usual for abstract groups, one may identify the quotient with $w^{-1}P_\theta w \cap P_\Omega\backslash P_\Omega$, and similarly for the quotient on the level of rational points. Therefore, the question becomes whether $\mathrm H^1(k, w^{-1}P_\theta w \cap P_\Omega) \to \mathrm H^1(k, P_\Omega)$ has trivial fibres.
Nov 9, 2018 at 16:55 history asked D_S CC BY-SA 4.0