Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 3, 2018 at 5:21 comment added user19475 For motives there is the notion of correspondences of degree $r$. One has $\mathrm{Corr}^0(X,Y) = \mathrm{Hom}(h(X),h(Y))$. See e.g. Scholl's article in the Motives volume I. The Hom between $h^1$ is the group of isogenies, $\mathrm{End}_{\mathcal{M}_\mathbf{Q}}(h^1(E)) = \mathrm{End}(E) \otimes_\mathbf{Z} \mathbf{Q}$ (Proposition 4.5).
Nov 3, 2018 at 3:27 history edited Michael Hardy CC BY-SA 4.0
added 48 characters in body
Nov 3, 2018 at 2:15 comment added Joe Silverman Not sure if this is the earliest usage, but it's the notation that Mumford uses in his classic book on Abelian Varieties. Indeed, he defines $\text{Hom}^0(X,Y)=\mathbb{Q}\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\text{Hom}(X,Y)$, as well as the analogous notation for End. This gives a new category in which the objects are abelian varieties and the morphisms are in Hom$^0$, which Mumford says is "the so-called category of 'abelian varieties up to isogeny'."
Nov 2, 2018 at 22:50 review First posts
Nov 3, 2018 at 1:35
Nov 2, 2018 at 22:49 comment added Wojowu I doubt it means anything beyond "the thing tensored with $\mathbb Q$". To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing as $End^1$.
Nov 2, 2018 at 22:46 history asked MachPortMassenger CC BY-SA 4.0