Timeline for Reference Request: Length of a reflection in a Coxeter group can be achieved by symmetric word
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2018 at 11:26 | answer | added | Nathan Reading | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 16:29 | vote | accept | ouimerci | ||
| Nov 4, 2018 at 15:06 | comment | added | ouimerci | @JimHumphreys: I'm not sure I understand the remark; is some sort of rewriting of the question in order? | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 15:03 | answer | added | Matt Samuel | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 15:02 | comment | added | ouimerci | @MattSamuel: I'd be happy with both! | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 15:00 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | P.S. As background, the definition of "reflection" implies that such an element is conjugate to a "simple" reflection (one relative to an element of $S$), though you do need to specify how a "root system" comes into the picture for infinite $W$. | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 14:54 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Matt: in your added comment, it's not quite clear what "this" refers to, but in any case a published proof is not required. However, it would probably help to give a more detailed reference to Fu's thesis or a published version of his depth formula. (Note too that a label such as (*) would be appropriate for that formula, and that you can highlight your question by typing > first.) | |
| Nov 4, 2018 at 11:50 | comment | added | Matt Samuel | Seeing as this is still unanswered, I could probably find a proof for this. Is that sufficient, or do you want a published reference? | |
| Nov 2, 2018 at 13:17 | history | edited | ouimerci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
language
|
| Nov 2, 2018 at 12:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 2, 2018 at 12:59 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2018 at 12:41 | history | asked | ouimerci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |