Timeline for What is the definition of a $\mathcal{U}$-category?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2021 at 10:29 | vote | accept | Jxt921 | ||
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Nov 26, 2018 at 19:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 26, 2018 at 19:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 18, 2018 at 17:27 | history | bounty started | Jxt921 | ||
| S Nov 18, 2018 at 17:27 | history | notice added | Jxt921 | Draw attention | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 20:44 | answer | added | Reid Barton | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 20:43 | comment | added | Maxime Ramzi | Definition (2) seems more reasonable and more in tune with we'd like to call $\mathcal{U}$-category. The problem with functor categories is an important one, and it makes sense that in general $[C,D]$ should not be a $\mathcal{U}$-category | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 18:23 | history | asked | Jxt921 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |