Timeline for How do I compare the different notions of Fourier transform for sheaves?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2011 at 21:46 | comment | added | JBorger | The recent work of Ahmed Abbes and Takeshi Saito is about the D-module / l-adic sheaf analogy. I haven't kept up with it myself, so I can't say for sure that it would help, but I'd suggest having a look. | |
| Nov 20, 2009 at 22:06 | answer | added | AFK | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 29, 2009 at 14:44 | history | edited | David Treumann | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
scale-equivariance should play a role
|
| Oct 28, 2009 at 21:27 | answer | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | timeline score: -4 | |
| Oct 28, 2009 at 21:22 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 28, 2009 at 21:21 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | Some parts of your question are very easy and interesting to read while other may benefit from some improvement. I wonder if there is a way to make this question very easy to read? Also, I was not familiar with the idiom "red herring" so I looked it up on Wikipedia which kind of slows the answering process -- a less determined person would just move to a next question. | |
| Oct 28, 2009 at 20:49 | history | asked | David Treumann | CC BY-SA 2.5 |