Timeline for Is the set of Lorentzian metrics metrizable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2018 at 17:18 | history | edited | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Slightly imprecise statements corrected
|
| Oct 24, 2018 at 17:56 | comment | added | L.F. Cavenaghi | That's ok Pedro, I am very thankful for your great answer and criticism, I totally agree I should have written the question in a more precise way, but, in my defense, I was just introduced to such theme yesterday and it was pretty fresh and not very clear on my head, but I totally agree, it should be more clear and precise. Thank you again, it will not happen on other questions. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 17:17 | comment | added | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | I apologize if the beginning of my answer sounded harsh. My point was that MO is a forum for research-level math questions, which therefore must be written as precisely as possible. More importantly, yes, I understood what you meant in your question but that might not be the case for others if you don't write the precise definition for the Whitney topologies, especially for the subject tag you chose, for which the notion is not exactly common knowledge. Anyhow, again I apologize for the tone. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 17:07 | comment | added | L.F. Cavenaghi | Thank you for the answer, I will just ask kindly to you be less rude, perhaps, of course my question should be improved but it seems you understood it and a little of kindness is not bad at all. Thank you again. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 16:33 | history | edited | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected typo
|
| Oct 24, 2018 at 6:24 | history | edited | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added remarks, corrected grammar mistakes
|
| Oct 24, 2018 at 3:39 | vote | accept | L.F. Cavenaghi | ||
| Oct 24, 2018 at 3:27 | history | answered | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |