Skip to main content

By 'work' I would like the correspondence between fiber functors (to finitely generated projective modules) and algebraic groups to be the same as in the field case.

Specifically, if A$A$ is an affine ring, and if Proj(A)$\operatorname{Proj}(A)$ is the category of finitely generated projective A-modules, when can we say that a fiber functor w:T->Proj(A)$w:\mathcal{T}\to\operatorname{Proj}(A)$ corresponds to an algebraic group over A$A$, where T$\mathcal{T}$ is an A$A$-linear tensor category.

By 'work' I would like the correspondence between fiber functors (to finitely generated projective modules) and algebraic groups to be the same as in the field case.

Specifically, if A is an affine ring, and if Proj(A) is the category of finitely generated projective A-modules, when can we say that a fiber functor w:T->Proj(A) corresponds to an algebraic group over A, where T is an A-linear tensor category.

By 'work' I would like the correspondence between fiber functors (to finitely generated projective modules) and algebraic groups to be the same as in the field case.

Specifically, if $A$ is an affine ring, and if $\operatorname{Proj}(A)$ is the category of finitely generated projective A-modules, when can we say that a fiber functor $w:\mathcal{T}\to\operatorname{Proj}(A)$ corresponds to an algebraic group over $A$, where $\mathcal{T}$ is an $A$-linear tensor category.

edited tags
Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 419
  • 763
Source Link
Benjamin Antieau
  • 5.1k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 37

When does Tannakian theory work over affine schemes besides fields?

By 'work' I would like the correspondence between fiber functors (to finitely generated projective modules) and algebraic groups to be the same as in the field case.

Specifically, if A is an affine ring, and if Proj(A) is the category of finitely generated projective A-modules, when can we say that a fiber functor w:T->Proj(A) corresponds to an algebraic group over A, where T is an A-linear tensor category.