Skip to main content
further minor clarifications
Source Link
GNiklasch
  • 2.4k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 26

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge.

My first suggestion had been to set $\beta_1=(\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2$, but that turns out not to work at all - it always ends up in one of the quadratic subfields (and as has been pointed out in the comments, it sometimes vanishes outright!).

Revised approach: By adding a rational number if necessary, we can assume from the start that $\alpha_1 = -\alpha_3$ is biquadratic (i.e., traceless over the quadratic subfield of $L_1$, and thus of the form $\pm\sqrt{m\pm\sqrt{n}}$ with nonzero rational $m,n$$m$ and the$n\ne 0$, and its conjugates correspondingcorrespond to all the sign combinations).

As a warm-up exercise, $\gamma_1=\alpha_1/\alpha_4$ is then conjugate to its inverse (under $1\leftrightarrow 4, 2\leftrightarrow 3$) and also to its negative inverse $\alpha_2/\alpha_1$ (under a 4-cycle), and not fixed by either operation; it is fixed however by the central involution $1\leftrightarrow 3, 2\leftrightarrow 4$, and thus it generates the abelian quartic field $L_0$.

Shifting things away from the traceless subspace destroys these relationships: $(1+\alpha_1)/(1+\alpha_4)$ generically generates the normal closure $M$. (When it doesn't, replace $1$ with another rational number.) And adding its inverse to it produces an element invariant under the desired involution: $$\beta_1=\frac{1+\alpha_1}{1+\alpha_4} + \frac{1+\alpha_4}{1+\alpha_1}$$

It remains to compute the symmetric functions of $\beta_1$ and its conjugates and to express them in terms of those of the $\alpha_i$.

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge.

My first suggestion had been to set $\beta_1=(\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2$, but that turns out not to work at all - it always ends up in one of the quadratic subfields (and as has been pointed out in the comments, it sometimes vanishes outright!).

Revised approach: By adding a rational number if necessary, we can assume from the start that $\alpha_1 = -\alpha_3$ is biquadratic (i.e., traceless over the quadratic subfield of $L_1$, and thus of the form $\pm\sqrt{m\pm\sqrt{n}}$ with nonzero rational $m,n$ and the conjugates corresponding to all the sign combinations).

As a warm-up exercise, $\gamma_1=\alpha_1/\alpha_4$ is then conjugate to its inverse (under $1\leftrightarrow 4, 2\leftrightarrow 3$) and also to its negative inverse $\alpha_2/\alpha_1$ (under a 4-cycle), and not fixed by either operation; thus it generates the abelian quartic field $L_0$.

Shifting things away from the traceless subspace destroys these relationships: $(1+\alpha_1)/(1+\alpha_4)$ generically generates the normal closure $M$. (When it doesn't, replace $1$ with another rational number.) And adding its inverse to it produces an element invariant under the desired involution: $$\beta_1=\frac{1+\alpha_1}{1+\alpha_4} + \frac{1+\alpha_4}{1+\alpha_1}$$

It remains to compute the symmetric functions of $\beta_1$ and its conjugates and to express them in terms of those of the $\alpha_i$.

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge.

My first suggestion had been to set $\beta_1=(\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2$, but that turns out not to work at all - it always ends up in one of the quadratic subfields (and as has been pointed out in the comments, it sometimes vanishes outright!).

Revised approach: By adding a rational number if necessary, we can assume from the start that $\alpha_1 = -\alpha_3$ is traceless over the quadratic subfield of $L_1$, and thus of the form $\pm\sqrt{m\pm\sqrt{n}}$ with rational $m$ and $n\ne 0$, and its conjugates correspond to all the sign combinations.

As a warm-up exercise, $\gamma_1=\alpha_1/\alpha_4$ is then conjugate to its inverse (under $1\leftrightarrow 4, 2\leftrightarrow 3$) and also to its negative inverse $\alpha_2/\alpha_1$ (under a 4-cycle), and not fixed by either operation; it is fixed however by the central involution $1\leftrightarrow 3, 2\leftrightarrow 4$, and thus it generates the abelian quartic field $L_0$.

Shifting things away from the traceless subspace destroys these relationships: $(1+\alpha_1)/(1+\alpha_4)$ generically generates the normal closure $M$. (When it doesn't, replace $1$ with another rational number.) And adding its inverse to it produces an element invariant under the desired involution: $$\beta_1=\frac{1+\alpha_1}{1+\alpha_4} + \frac{1+\alpha_4}{1+\alpha_1}$$

It remains to compute the symmetric functions of $\beta_1$ and its conjugates and to express them in terms of those of the $\alpha_i$.

wrong argument replaced
Source Link
GNiklasch
  • 2.4k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 26

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge. One combination which

My first suggestion had been to set $\beta_1=(\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2$, but that turns out not to work at all - it always ends up in one of the quadratic subfields (genericallyand as has been pointed out in the comments, it sometimes vanishes outright!) does this trick is.

Revised approach: By adding a rational number if necessary, we can assume from the start that $$\beta_1 = (\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2,$$ with conjugates$\alpha_1 = -\alpha_3$ is biquadratic $\beta_2 = (\alpha_1-\alpha_2)^2 - (\alpha_4-\alpha_3)^2$(i.e., traceless over the quadratic subfield of $\beta_3 = -\beta_1$$L_1$, and thus of the form $\beta_4 = -\beta_2$$\pm\sqrt{m\pm\sqrt{n}}$ with nonzero rational $m,n$ and the conjugates corresponding to all the sign combinations).

ComputingAs a warm-up exercise, $\gamma_1=\alpha_1/\alpha_4$ is then conjugate to its inverse (under $1\leftrightarrow 4, 2\leftrightarrow 3$) and also to its negative inverse $\alpha_2/\alpha_1$ (under a 4-cycle), and not fixed by either operation; thus it generates the abelian quartic covariant/resolventfield $g$ of which$L_0$.

Shifting things away from the traceless subspace destroys these arerelationships: $(1+\alpha_1)/(1+\alpha_4)$ generically generates the roots in terms ofnormal closure $M$. (When it doesn't, replace $1$ with another rational number.) And adding its inverse to it produces an element invariant under the desired involution: $$\beta_1=\frac{1+\alpha_1}{1+\alpha_4} + \frac{1+\alpha_4}{1+\alpha_1}$$

It remains to compute the symmetric functions of $\beta_1$ and its conjugates and to express them in terms of those of the $\alpha_i$ is left as an exercise. Conveniently, the trace vanishes.

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge. One combination which (generically) does this trick is $$\beta_1 = (\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2,$$ with conjugates $\beta_2 = (\alpha_1-\alpha_2)^2 - (\alpha_4-\alpha_3)^2$, $\beta_3 = -\beta_1$, and $\beta_4 = -\beta_2$.

Computing the quartic covariant/resolvent $g$ of which these are the roots in terms of the symmetric functions of the $\alpha_i$ is left as an exercise. Conveniently, the trace vanishes.

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge.

My first suggestion had been to set $\beta_1=(\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2$, but that turns out not to work at all - it always ends up in one of the quadratic subfields (and as has been pointed out in the comments, it sometimes vanishes outright!).

Revised approach: By adding a rational number if necessary, we can assume from the start that $\alpha_1 = -\alpha_3$ is biquadratic (i.e., traceless over the quadratic subfield of $L_1$, and thus of the form $\pm\sqrt{m\pm\sqrt{n}}$ with nonzero rational $m,n$ and the conjugates corresponding to all the sign combinations).

As a warm-up exercise, $\gamma_1=\alpha_1/\alpha_4$ is then conjugate to its inverse (under $1\leftrightarrow 4, 2\leftrightarrow 3$) and also to its negative inverse $\alpha_2/\alpha_1$ (under a 4-cycle), and not fixed by either operation; thus it generates the abelian quartic field $L_0$.

Shifting things away from the traceless subspace destroys these relationships: $(1+\alpha_1)/(1+\alpha_4)$ generically generates the normal closure $M$. (When it doesn't, replace $1$ with another rational number.) And adding its inverse to it produces an element invariant under the desired involution: $$\beta_1=\frac{1+\alpha_1}{1+\alpha_4} + \frac{1+\alpha_4}{1+\alpha_1}$$

It remains to compute the symmetric functions of $\beta_1$ and its conjugates and to express them in terms of those of the $\alpha_i$.

Source Link
GNiklasch
  • 2.4k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 26

Let $\alpha=\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3, \alpha_4$ be the conjugates of $\alpha$ in $M$, numbered so that one of the 4-cycles in the Galois group permutes them in the order $\alpha_1 \mapsto \alpha_2 \mapsto \alpha_3 \mapsto \alpha_4 \mapsto \alpha_1$.

Thus $L_1=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1) = \mathbb{Q}(\alpha_3)$ is fixed by that automorphism which interchanges $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_4$. (Think of a square with corners labeled $1,2,3,4$ being reflected through the diagonal passing through corner number $1$. And $L_0$ corresponds to the central inversion symmetry of the square.)

The outer automorphism of $D_4$ amounts to looking at how rigid motions act on the set of unoriented edges of the square instead of on the corners: what fixes an edge is reflecting the square across the bisector. We're thus looking for an element fixed e.g. under simultaneously exchanging $\alpha_1$ with $\alpha_4$ and $\alpha_2$ with $\alpha_3$, and not fixed under the other non-identity permutations coming from the Galois group. In particular, it must not remain fixed when we reflect the chosen edge onto its opposite edge. One combination which (generically) does this trick is $$\beta_1 = (\alpha_4-\alpha_1)^2 - (\alpha_3-\alpha_2)^2,$$ with conjugates $\beta_2 = (\alpha_1-\alpha_2)^2 - (\alpha_4-\alpha_3)^2$, $\beta_3 = -\beta_1$, and $\beta_4 = -\beta_2$.

Computing the quartic covariant/resolvent $g$ of which these are the roots in terms of the symmetric functions of the $\alpha_i$ is left as an exercise. Conveniently, the trace vanishes.