Timeline for Fourier expansion at inequivalent cusps
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2018 at 0:54 | comment | added | Emmanuel Lecouturier | The Fourier expansion of a modular form at an arbitrary cusp is not something well-defined (because of parabolic elements). Only the constant coefficient can be well-defined (sometimes up to sign). | |
| Oct 22, 2018 at 12:59 | vote | accept | Gabriele | ||
| Oct 12, 2018 at 15:02 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 12, 2018 at 15:00 | answer | added | François Brunault | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 8, 2018 at 21:39 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 8, 2018 at 17:08 | answer | added | Matt Young | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 8, 2018 at 16:30 | comment | added | Siksek | If I remember correctly, the PhD thesis of Christophe Delaunay talks about this. See III.2 of delaunay.perso.math.cnrs.fr/these.pdf | |
| Oct 8, 2018 at 16:29 | answer | added | Henri Cohen | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 8, 2018 at 15:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 8, 2018 at 15:58 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2018 at 15:38 | history | asked | Gabriele | CC BY-SA 4.0 |