Timeline for differential of stable map and boundry divisor
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 8, 2018 at 9:10 | history | edited | Tom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 77 characters in body
|
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:46 | comment | added | Tom | I cant understand comments that you implied and is written in the paper.I dont understand what here mean by fibre evaluation and why we have that surjection for first map. | |
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:37 | comment | added | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | As an aid to a possible answerer you could add in the body of the question the context. There is A LOT said in the paper about what you are asking. Could you tell us what you do understand from what is said there, and what specifically you do not understand? For example, right after the display you reproduce, it is said: "The first map in (36) is the natural surjection of Def(µ) onto the deformation space of the moduli problem obtained by forgetting all the markings except •. The natural fiber evaluation $H^0(\mu^*TX)\to TX(\mu(p\bullet))$.." etc. What exactly is clear and what unclear here? | |
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:12 | history | edited | Tom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
Oct 6, 2018 at 17:44 | history | edited | Tom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:59 | history | edited | Tom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 60 characters in body
|
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:59 | comment | added | Samir Canning | I was able to guess what you meant by FP-notes, but it would be easier for everyone if you wrote out “the notes of Fulton and Pandharipande” and left a link: arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9608011 | |
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:49 | comment | added | Tom | I wrote.these things are in FP-notes.You mean more refrences? | |
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:46 | comment | added | Piotr Achinger | Please add some details (notation, references) - as-is, your question is incomprehensible. | |
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:06 | history | asked | Tom | CC BY-SA 4.0 |