Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 8, 2018 at 9:10 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 4.0
added 77 characters in body
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:46 comment added Tom I cant understand comments that you implied and is written in the paper.I dont understand what here mean by fibre evaluation and why we have that surjection for first map.
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:37 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე As an aid to a possible answerer you could add in the body of the question the context. There is A LOT said in the paper about what you are asking. Could you tell us what you do understand from what is said there, and what specifically you do not understand? For example, right after the display you reproduce, it is said: "The first map in (36) is the natural surjection of Def(µ) onto the deformation space of the moduli problem obtained by forgetting all the markings except •. The natural fiber evaluation $H^0(\mu^*TX)\to TX(\mu(p\bullet))$.." etc. What exactly is clear and what unclear here?
Oct 6, 2018 at 19:12 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 4.0
added 29 characters in body
Oct 6, 2018 at 17:44 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:59 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 4.0
added 60 characters in body
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:59 comment added Samir Canning I was able to guess what you meant by FP-notes, but it would be easier for everyone if you wrote out “the notes of Fulton and Pandharipande” and left a link: arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9608011
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:49 comment added Tom I wrote.these things are in FP-notes.You mean more refrences?
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:46 comment added Piotr Achinger Please add some details (notation, references) - as-is, your question is incomprehensible.
Oct 6, 2018 at 14:06 history asked Tom CC BY-SA 4.0