Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
deleted 120 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Borovoi
Mikhail Borovoi
  • 14.2k
  • 2
  • 32
  • 72

I personally regard an arXiv preprint as a usual article, just not refereed. One should be able to refer to it, hence it should contain full proofs. After you put your results with full proofs on arXiv, you will be able to write a short answer to your question (not necessarily as a CW) with a reference to your preprint. This acceptable; see this answer. Of course, it would be nice to give more details than Rami in this answer did.

I personally regard an arXiv preprint as a usual article, just not refereed. One should be able to refer to it, hence it should contain full proofs. After you put your results with full proofs on arXiv, you will be able to write a short answer to your question (not necessarily as a CW) with a reference to your preprint. This acceptable; see this answer. Of course, it would be nice to give more details than Rami in this answer did.

I personally regard an arXiv preprint as a usual article, just not refereed. One should be able to refer to it, hence it should contain full proofs. After you put your results with full proofs on arXiv, you will be able to write a short answer to your question (not necessarily as a CW) with a reference to your preprint. This acceptable; see this answer.

Source Link
Mikhail Borovoi
Mikhail Borovoi
  • 14.2k
  • 2
  • 32
  • 72

I personally regard an arXiv preprint as a usual article, just not refereed. One should be able to refer to it, hence it should contain full proofs. After you put your results with full proofs on arXiv, you will be able to write a short answer to your question (not necessarily as a CW) with a reference to your preprint. This acceptable; see this answer. Of course, it would be nice to give more details than Rami in this answer did.