Timeline for mod p etale cohomology of the special fiber and the generic fiber
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S May 4, 2019 at 5:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 4, 2019 at 5:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 26, 2019 at 3:08 | history | bounty started | Zhiyu | ||
| S Apr 26, 2019 at 3:08 | history | notice added | Zhiyu | Draw attention | |
| Oct 3, 2018 at 22:12 | history | edited | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 558 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2018 at 23:18 | history | edited | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2018 at 11:44 | comment | added | Piotr Achinger | @gdb Possible argument: $\pi_1(X_{\bar K})\to \pi_1(X_{\bar k})$ is surjective (SGA1), so $\mathrm{Hom}( \pi_1(X_{\bar k}), \mathbf{F}_p)\to \mathrm{Hom}( \pi_1(X_{\bar K}), \mathbf{F}_p)$ is injective, but $\mathrm{Hom}(\pi_1, \mathbf{F}_p) = H^1(\pi_1, \mathbf{F}_p) = H^1(X, \mathbf{F}_p)$? | |
| Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 | comment | added | gdb | What's your argument for $i=1$? | |
| Oct 1, 2018 at 3:06 | history | edited | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 226 characters in body
|
| Sep 30, 2018 at 16:56 | history | edited | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 60 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:10 | answer | added | Boa | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 9:46 | answer | added | Martin Bright | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 27, 2018 at 22:02 | history | edited | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 130 characters in body
|
| Sep 27, 2018 at 21:00 | history | asked | Zhiyu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |