Timeline for What's the current state of the classification of not-fully-extended TQFTs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2020 at 15:07 | comment | added | Student | related: [Modular categories as representations of the 3-dimensional bordism 2-category-[Bruce Bartlett, Christopher L. Douglas, Christopher J. Schommer-Pries and Jamie Vicary]-[arXiv:1509.06811]](arxiv.org/abs/1509.06811) | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 16:30 | answer | added | Jacob Lurie | timeline score: 42 | |
| Jul 11, 2010 at 2:06 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Jul 9, 2010 at 17:24 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @Ben: Well, the answer "no" is more or less what I expected the answer to be :) | |
| Jul 9, 2010 at 16:52 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | You should expect the non-fully extended cases to be substantially harder. For example, 012 TQFTs are rigid (have no deformations) while 12 TQFTs can come in families. | |
| Jul 9, 2010 at 13:14 | answer | added | Kevin Walker | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jul 9, 2010 at 11:41 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | I'm really tempted to just write "no," but I'll let a more knowledgeable person do that. The summary I got was that Lurie's technique really depended strongly on going all the way to the point, and one can't hope to get the classification you want with some new developments. | |
| Jul 9, 2010 at 5:35 | history | asked | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |