Timeline for Have there been any updates on Mochizuki's proposed proof of the abc conjecture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2020 at 11:45 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | @estan Also, the workshop date seems to have been moved to September. | |
| Apr 6, 2020 at 16:18 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Apr 4, 2020 at 21:06 | comment | added | estan | @TimothyChow I note that Stix's name has since been removed from the list of invited speakers on that workshop page. It was still there on Dec 5 2019, but was removed some time between then and Feb 8 2020. | |
| Nov 22, 2019 at 18:29 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | There's a RIMS workshop coming up in May 2020 which is one of four workshops of a special RIMS year on "Expanding Horizons of Inter-universal Teichmüller Theory." Notably, Jakob Stix is an invited speaker. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 22:32 | comment | added | jjcale | See also "Comments on Mochizuki’s 2018 Report" by David Roberts : thehighergeometer.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/… | |
| Oct 10, 2018 at 13:57 | comment | added | PJTraill | These results render the 2017-12 Wordpress post The ABC conjecture has (still) not been proved by Galois representations a little out of date, but it is still interesting, particularly the replies of 2017-12-21 by PS and 2017-12-22 by BCnrd. | |
| Sep 22, 2018 at 15:17 | comment | added | PseudoNeo | To a complete outsider, the thinly veiled insults Mochizuki addresses to Scholze and Stix in that response are surprising, to say the least. | |
| Sep 22, 2018 at 0:43 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @user170039 like I said, "that I understand that has real bearing". There are lots of things in that 40-odd page report that are irrelevancies from a structural, isomorphism-invariant point of view. Demanding specific symbols for objects in order to make the proof work is not a mathematical concern, but a psychological one. | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 23:51 | comment | added | bof | A Corollary with a 9-page proof? Is that a record? | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 13:59 | comment | added | user57432 | @DavidRoberts: See this paper for a latest update. | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 5:26 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | The only criticism of M that I can understand that has real bearing on the ScSt report is that he claims (Comment (Lin) in kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Cmt2018-08.pdf) they assume certain maps between 1-dimensional ordered vector spaces over R (the commutative hexagon at the end) are linear, when they are not. I feel it would be most useful if these maps could be transparently defined so we can see where the problem lies. | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 0:26 | comment | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | The article by Erica Klarreich was really good! | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 0:18 | history | edited | Suvrit | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo fix in Jakob's name
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 23:53 | history | edited | Dima Pasechnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
less loaded abbreviations...
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:25 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:29 | |||||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:15 | history | edited | none | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 169 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:24 | |||||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:09 | history | answered | none | CC BY-SA 4.0 |