Timeline for The vanishing of Ramanujan's Function tau(n)
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 7:31 | history | edited | Bruce Westbury | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
More information provided
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 0:49 | comment | added | Wadim Zudilin | Bruce, but what means "for each sufficiently large $N$" in your paper? Is $N=5$ sufficiently large? You interpret $\tau(n)$ as dimensions of certain representations. How does the sign of $\tau(n)$ appear there? What is wrong in having $\tau(n)=0$? I am wondering about the last question, since I am wondering whether your approach can be used in proving some partial results towards Lehmer's question (mathoverflow.net/questions/32620). | |
| Jul 8, 2010 at 15:31 | history | answered | Bruce Westbury | CC BY-SA 2.5 |