Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 13, 2018 at 19:02 comment added Gjergji Zaimi I am curious whether one can cook up a combinatorial argument for $4k+2$-dimensional simplicial complexes.
Sep 11, 2018 at 20:58 comment added Qiaochu Yuan Here is the opposite of what you asked for, the least elementary proofs I know: qchu.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/…
Sep 11, 2018 at 19:37 vote accept Neil Strickland
Sep 11, 2018 at 18:35 answer added Gjergji Zaimi timeline score: 15
Sep 11, 2018 at 14:12 comment added mme @FrancescoPolizzi Yes, but you need some form of Poincare duality. I suppose it would become very explicit in terms of dual triangulations in this case, which could be useful.
Sep 11, 2018 at 13:33 comment added Francesco Polizzi Is $(2)$ independent on the classification (I mean, the part about the non-degenericity of the intersection form)?
Sep 11, 2018 at 13:32 comment added Francesco Polizzi I do not think this is so easy. You must use orientability in some essential way, and at the and of the story this could be more or less equivalent to the classification. A possible strategy of proof is noticing that (1) since $S$ is orientable than $H^2(S, \, \mathbb{R})$ is one-dimensional, generated by the orientation class and (2) $H^1(S, \, \mathbb{R})$ carries a symplectic form given by the intersection of $1$-cycles, hence it is even-dimensional.
Sep 11, 2018 at 13:08 comment added Neil Strickland @FrancescoPolizzi Yes.
Sep 11, 2018 at 13:06 comment added Francesco Polizzi You want a direct proof avoiding the use of the classification, right?
Sep 11, 2018 at 12:54 history asked Neil Strickland CC BY-SA 4.0