Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 11, 2019 at 0:35 comment added Mark S In the comments in the Quanta article Thomas Bloom states: "Actually it was Shkredov and Konyagin who were the first to improve the 4/3 exponent of Solymosi, and it was their approach that was subsequently improved by Rudnev, Shkredov, and Stevens."
Feb 10, 2019 at 19:58 comment added Fedor Petrov @MarkS probably it does (I did not check the Shakan's proof myself). The Quanta article somehow misses the Konyagin-Shkredov result in the brief historical survey, I hope that it was not intentional.
Feb 8, 2019 at 13:34 comment added Mark S Does this Quanta article on the problem and of Shakan's recent paper claiming $4/3+5/5277$ further the story?
Jan 17, 2019 at 21:46 history edited Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 4.0
added 72 characters in body
Sep 8, 2018 at 12:33 comment added Wojowu @VesselinDimitrov I would say this deserves a separate answer. Regardless of how one judges this result, I think it fits well with the spirit of the question.
Sep 7, 2018 at 22:13 comment added Vesselin Dimitrov One other notable example from the same area, already mentioned in the very first section 1.1.1 of Tao and Vu's book. Erdos showed that any finite set $A \subset \mathbb{Z}$ of integers contains a subset $B \subset A$ with $|B| > (|A| + 1)/3$ and free of solutions to $x+y = z$. In Estimates related to sumfree subsets of sets of integers (Israel J. Math., 1997), Bourgain applies an ingenious harmonic analysis to strengthen this bound to... $(|A| + 2)/3$. Then again, this establishes the non-sharpness of a classical result, so who judges whether the improvement is "only by a short amount?"
Sep 6, 2018 at 15:59 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan
Sep 6, 2018 at 12:56 history edited Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 4.0
added 62 characters in body
S Sep 6, 2018 at 12:20 history suggested user21820 CC BY-SA 4.0
grammar ≥ 10 char
Sep 6, 2018 at 10:52 review Suggested edits
S Sep 6, 2018 at 12:20
Sep 6, 2018 at 9:25 history answered Fedor Petrov CC BY-SA 4.0