Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 4, 2018 at 3:20 history edited dave2d CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 17 characters in body
Sep 4, 2018 at 2:37 comment added Noam D. Elkies The principal minors detect the signs of the eigenvalues, not their precise sizes. For example, $\bigl({1 \; 1 \atop 1 \; 3}\bigr)$ has eigenvalues $2 \pm \sqrt 2$.
Sep 4, 2018 at 2:30 comment added Venkataramana I am missing something. Computing principal minors, I seem to get (after removing column and row of zeros) the numbers 1,2, 4,4,4,.... This seems to say the eigenvalues are 1,2,2,1,1,1,...?
Sep 4, 2018 at 2:07 comment added AccidentalFourierTransform presumably of interest: Perron–Frobenius theorem.
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:58 vote accept dave2d
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:55 comment added Noam D. Elkies Also, removing the row and column of zeros yields the inverse of the tridiagonal matrix with $-1$ on the two off-diagonals and $2$ in all diagonal entries except for a $1$ in the bottom right corner.
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:50 comment added Noam D. Elkies Numerical experimentation suggests that this matrix [gp: matrix(n,n,i,j,min(i,j)-1) ] has characteristic polynomial $\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} (-1)^k {n-1+k \choose n-1-k} x^{n-k}$, and nonzero roots $-2\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} k \cos(2\pi jk/(2n-1))$ for $0<j<n$, with $j=1$ producing the maximal root.
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:30 history edited dave2d CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:25 answer added Suvrit timeline score: 6
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:15 review First posts
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:18
Sep 4, 2018 at 1:14 history asked dave2d CC BY-SA 4.0