Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 19, 2023 at 13:44 comment added Michael Hardy $\ldots\,$and then getting into limits of difference quotients, as in $\lim_{\Delta x\,\to\,0} \Delta y/\Delta x = dy/dx.$ Trying to teach all the technical prerequisites to a subject before beginning to teach the subject is the way almost the whole mathematics curriculum is organized from kindergarten through graduate study, and is OBVIOUSLY the cause of most of the popular superstitions about mathematics, to the effect that doing mathematics consists of mechanically applying memorized algorithms, or that mathematics is a subject in which everything is already known. $\qquad$
Apr 19, 2023 at 13:42 comment added Michael Hardy $\ldots\,$that subject spend a few hundred pages on technical preliminaries before getting very very slowly into what the subject is actually about. And that leads us to another division between kinds of books for students: there are the very many that undertake to teach all the various technical preliminaries to a subject before getting into the actual subject matter in which those preliminaries are used. E.g. let's consider a variety of different sorts of limits before getting to derivatives, as opposed to first learning thoroughly about applications of difference quotients$\,\ldots\qquad$
Apr 19, 2023 at 13:39 comment added Michael Hardy Maybe any reasonable division of books for students into categories similar in spirit to this one ought to include more than two categories. There are (few) books that go for breadth rather than depth: perhaps the textbooks for certain lower-level undergraduate courses fit here, doing some discrete math of various sorts, some topology, some statistics, etc., a lot of it with a view to applications. There is also Boolos & Jeffrey's Computability and Logic, which is good for any mathematician who wants to find out what mathematical logic is about. Other introductory books on$\,\ldots\qquad$
Apr 19, 2023 at 13:35 answer added Michael Hardy timeline score: -1
Jan 13, 2019 at 2:30 review Close votes
Jan 13, 2019 at 10:23
Sep 24, 2018 at 18:02 answer added Scrope timeline score: 2
Sep 3, 2018 at 15:31 comment added mweiss There is a related question at math.stackexchange.com/questions/828458/….
Sep 3, 2018 at 5:25 comment added user44143 Thurston’s “On Proof and Progress in Mathematics” is not a book, but still a classic text on this topic. arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236
Sep 2, 2018 at 23:19 answer added syntonicC timeline score: 4
Sep 2, 2018 at 18:25 answer added Andrea timeline score: 5
Sep 2, 2018 at 18:20 answer added Duchamp Gérard H. E. timeline score: 0
Sep 2, 2018 at 17:42 answer added Lubin timeline score: 12
Sep 2, 2018 at 17:30 answer added Zach Teitler timeline score: 14
Sep 2, 2018 at 16:41 answer added Johann Cigler timeline score: 0
Sep 2, 2018 at 14:59 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Sep 2, 2018 at 14:47 answer added Kimball timeline score: 3
Sep 2, 2018 at 14:22 answer added Joseph O'Rourke timeline score: 3
Sep 2, 2018 at 14:15 review Close votes
Sep 3, 2018 at 13:17
Sep 2, 2018 at 13:35 answer added Alexandre Eremenko timeline score: 26
Sep 2, 2018 at 13:28 comment added user57432 How about this book?
Sep 2, 2018 at 12:10 answer added Goldstern timeline score: 10
Sep 2, 2018 at 11:49 answer added Gerald Edgar timeline score: 4
Sep 2, 2018 at 11:15 answer added Francois Ziegler timeline score: -1
Sep 2, 2018 at 10:57 history edited Allawonder CC BY-SA 4.0
added 79 characters in body
Sep 2, 2018 at 9:18 answer added Stefano Gogioso timeline score: 8
Sep 2, 2018 at 7:57 history asked Allawonder CC BY-SA 4.0