Skip to main content
formatted citation
Source Link
András Bátkai
  • 4.7k
  • 6
  • 31
  • 54

In the following paper (Example 2.1), it has been mentioned to K+M to provide an example of a pseudo valuation domain which is not a valuation ring, and its reference is Gilmer's book, but I have no access to Gilmer's book.

Can someone help me and explain what K+M is?

"Hedstrom, J.R., HoustonHedstrom, J. R.; Houston, E. G., E.G.: Pseudo-valuation domains. II, PacificHouston J. Math., 4, 199-207 (1978). , 199–207"ZBL0416.13014.

In the following paper (Example 2.1), it has been mentioned to K+M to provide an example of a pseudo valuation domain which is not a valuation ring, and its reference is Gilmer's book, but I have no access to Gilmer's book.

Can someone help me and explain what K+M is?

"Hedstrom, J.R., Houston, E.G.: Pseudo-valuation domains, Pacific J. Math., 4 (1978) , 199–207"

In the following paper (Example 2.1), it has been mentioned to K+M to provide an example of a pseudo valuation domain which is not a valuation ring, and its reference is Gilmer's book, but I have no access to Gilmer's book.

Can someone help me and explain what K+M is?

Hedstrom, J. R.; Houston, E. G., Pseudo-valuation domains. II, Houston J. Math. 4, 199-207 (1978). ZBL0416.13014.

Source Link

What is K+M structure?

In the following paper (Example 2.1), it has been mentioned to K+M to provide an example of a pseudo valuation domain which is not a valuation ring, and its reference is Gilmer's book, but I have no access to Gilmer's book.

Can someone help me and explain what K+M is?

"Hedstrom, J.R., Houston, E.G.: Pseudo-valuation domains, Pacific J. Math., 4 (1978) , 199–207"