Timeline for References for Hilbert schemes over non-Archimedean valuation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018 at 14:22 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | By 'the non-archimedean setting', do you mean some category of rigid or adic spaces? Typically, Hilbert polynomials are attached to an ample line bundle on a proper space, making the space projective (hence algebraic). So I think the analytic theory should not differ from the algebraic one. | |
| Sep 23, 2018 at 4:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 29, 2018 at 14:33 | |||||
| S Sep 22, 2018 at 21:13 | history | suggested | Armando j18eos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I had add some tag
|
| Sep 22, 2018 at 19:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 22, 2018 at 21:13 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2018 at 20:42 | comment | added | Daniel Loughran | The Hilbert scheme and Hibert polynomial make sense over any field. What in particular do you want to know about the case of non-archimedean fields? Or am I misunderstanding your question? | |
| Aug 24, 2018 at 15:08 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor typo
|
| Aug 24, 2018 at 15:04 | history | asked | Sam Taylor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |