Timeline for Motivation of proof of Riemann-Roch for elliptic curve and generalizations
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2010 at 19:34 | comment | added | David Corwin | Thanks, though I looked at that book, and it seems a bit more advanced than I'm able to understand. | |
| Jul 7, 2010 at 11:48 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
downcase
|
| Jul 7, 2010 at 11:41 | comment | added | Boyarsky | When you get around to reading Chapter 1 of Mumford's book on abelian varieties you'll this all of this done very conceptually in any dimension. Often linear algebra ideas become clearer in that generality. In fact, since it requires nothing beyond Fourier analysis in several variables, some cohomology basics which you seem to know already, and willingness to take on faith that holomorphic line bundles on complex Euclidean spaces are globally free (a basic fact from the theory of Stein spaces), you could read it now. It's nice! | |
| Jul 7, 2010 at 10:49 | history | edited | Anweshi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Apologies if there is an abstract notion of "meromorphic functor" that I'm not aware of.
|
| Jul 7, 2010 at 7:01 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 118 characters in body
|
| Jul 7, 2010 at 6:15 | comment | added | Robin Chapman | I removed it. | |
| Jul 7, 2010 at 6:14 | history | edited | Robin Chapman |
removed tag
|
|
| Jul 7, 2010 at 1:50 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Is the 'complex' tag a typo? | |
| Jul 6, 2010 at 23:36 | history | asked | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |