Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 14, 2018 at 3:00 review Reopen votes
Aug 15, 2018 at 14:04
Aug 7, 2018 at 3:24 history edited nodarkside CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 8 characters in body
Aug 7, 2018 at 1:38 history edited nodarkside CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 15 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 16:20 review Reopen votes
Aug 7, 2018 at 9:12
Aug 6, 2018 at 16:01 history edited nodarkside CC BY-SA 4.0
added 960 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 15:30 vote accept nodarkside
Aug 4, 2018 at 13:44 history closed Yemon Choi
Francois Ziegler
Ben McKay
Gro-Tsen
R W
Not suitable for this site
Aug 4, 2018 at 8:22 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 7
Aug 4, 2018 at 0:56 history edited David Roberts CC BY-SA 4.0
Formatting, changed tags (fields ≠ vector fields)
Aug 3, 2018 at 21:13 answer added Qfwfq timeline score: 3
Aug 3, 2018 at 21:10 history edited nodarkside CC BY-SA 4.0
added 28 characters in body
Aug 3, 2018 at 21:07 comment added nodarkside Yes @Qfwfq, this something should be a second order tensor field. I have edited the question to be clearer.
Aug 3, 2018 at 21:03 comment added Qfwfq (...Unless maybe you define the divergence of a tensor field or something...)
Aug 3, 2018 at 21:00 comment added Qfwfq Isn't the divergence $\mathrm{div}\boldsymbol{F}$ of a vector field $\boldsymbol{F}$ always a scalar? Your expression is a $3$-components vector field...
Aug 3, 2018 at 20:45 review Close votes
Aug 4, 2018 at 13:50
Aug 3, 2018 at 20:13 comment added Carlo Beenakker it is possible if the Laplacian of $\phi$ vanishes.
Aug 3, 2018 at 20:02 review First posts
Aug 3, 2018 at 20:51
Aug 3, 2018 at 19:59 history asked nodarkside CC BY-SA 4.0