Timeline for Non-separable metric probability space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:56 | comment | added | Robert Furber | @AryehKontorovich That was loose wording by me (I have edited the answer). What I mean is the existence of such a cardinal being consistent. | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:54 | history | edited | Robert Furber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Rephrased some lax wording about consistency of existence of measurable cardinals
|
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:46 | comment | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | What does it mean for a cardinal to be consistent? | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:29 | comment | added | Robert Furber | @AryehKontorovich On my side it looks like my counter-edit won, so there is no problem with the answer as it is now. | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:28 | comment | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | I see. Are you able to roll back my edit? | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:10 | history | edited | Robert Furber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added a new reference for Ulam's theorems.
|
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:06 | comment | added | Robert Furber | @AryehKontorovich The $\aleph_1$ is intentional. It's a strict inequality. Otherwise the definition of $\kappa$-additivity doesn't work in the definition of a measurable cardinal (the measure is only additive for disjoint families strictly smaller than $\kappa$). Sets of cardinality $< \aleph_1$ are exactly countable sets. | |
S Aug 2, 2018 at 10:05 | history | edited | Robert Furber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edit to correct a mistaken impression that prompted another edit.
|
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:02 | comment | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | I made an edit, please confirm. | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 10:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 2, 2018 at 10:05 | |||||
Aug 2, 2018 at 9:11 | comment | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | Many thanks for the detailed and very helpful answer, @Robert! I've upvoted and would upvote again several times if I could. | |
Aug 1, 2018 at 22:28 | history | answered | Robert Furber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |