Timeline for Minimal resolution of local cohomology module
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 at 6:35 | vote | accept | Cusp | ||
| S Aug 9, 2018 at 19:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 9, 2018 at 19:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 8, 2018 at 19:31 | vote | accept | Cusp | ||
| Nov 23, 2018 at 6:35 | |||||
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:57 | answer | added | Hailong Dao | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:41 | history | edited | Zach Teitler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix typo in title
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:08 | comment | added | Cusp | Noetherian local ring with dim R>0 and depth R=0. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:02 | comment | added | Cusp | @HailongDao depth R=0. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:02 | history | edited | Cusp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 171 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:01 | comment | added | Hailong Dao | Is there a motivation for this? In general not much can be said. For this questio to be interesting, $R$ is not Cohen-Macaulay to begin with, and there is not much known about resolutions over such rings. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 5:56 | comment | added | Cusp | @HailongDao Yes. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 0:19 | comment | added | Hailong Dao | Resolution over $R$? | |
| S Aug 1, 2018 at 17:10 | history | bounty started | Cusp | ||
| S Aug 1, 2018 at 17:10 | history | notice added | Cusp | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 17:05 | history | asked | Cusp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |