Timeline for In what sense are fields an algebraic theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 at 22:26 | vote | accept | Omar Antolín-Camarena | ||
| Mar 7, 2010 at 22:25 | vote | accept | Omar Antolín-Camarena | ||
| Mar 7, 2010 at 22:26 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2010 at 17:58 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | Combining your answer with Andrew Stacey's, might this be a reason to think that there would be an interesting notion of algebraic geometry over meadows? | |
| Nov 23, 2009 at 18:46 | vote | accept | Omar Antolín-Camarena | ||
| Nov 23, 2009 at 18:46 | |||||
| Oct 29, 2009 at 7:59 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | Thanks for the confirmation! I doubted that fields would be even essentially algebraic but wasn't sure that there wasn't a sneaky way to do it. | |
| Oct 28, 2009 at 15:28 | history | answered | Tom Leinster | CC BY-SA 2.5 |