Timeline for What metatheory proves cut elimination for Simple Type Theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 at 3:07 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2018 at 1:41 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected a detail in describing Takeuti's sense of SST.
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 23:09 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 22:54 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Expanded on what Takeuite means by Simple Type Theory.
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 14:17 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | Can you tell us a bit more about what you're talking about here. Is this just simple type theory (but you have comprehension?!) or simple type theory + first-order logic on top, or what? (I don't have Takeuti's book here.) | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 12:14 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added (inconclusive) reason to suspect EFA is too weak.
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 0:56 | history | edited | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Jul 24, 2018 at 23:50 | history | asked | Colin McLarty | CC BY-SA 4.0 |