Timeline for What is the best reference for motives?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2018 at 23:25 | vote | accept | Gear | ||
Jul 24, 2018 at 23:25 | vote | accept | Gear | ||
Jul 24, 2018 at 23:25 | |||||
Jul 24, 2018 at 23:25 | vote | accept | Gear | ||
Jul 24, 2018 at 23:25 | |||||
Jul 23, 2018 at 17:16 | answer | added | jmc | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 11:28 | comment | added | François Brunault | A reference for learning motives is Lectures on the Theory of Pure Motives by Murre, Nagel, Peters. It does not address homotopy theory however. | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 9:01 | comment | added | Gear | I intend both but mainly I want to know about motives. Thank you for letting me know it, I saw it just now. I just started using MO, so I didn’t know how to use... I will search past MO questions. Thank you very much,Qfwfq. | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:53 | comment | added | user19475 | One reference for motives is Andre, Y. Une Introduction aux Motifs (SMF 2004). | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:42 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 30, 2018 at 3:00 | |||||
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 | comment | added | Qfwfq | If you're asking for a roadmap to motives and also references for general algebraic geometry beyond Hartshorne's book, I think the question is too broad for MO. If you actually intend to ask only about motives, anyway, have you made a google search? A search within past MO questions (e.g. mathoverflow.net/questions/11932/references-for-artin-motives)? What does/does not satisfy you about that material? | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:30 | answer | added | Liam Keenan | timeline score: 8 | |
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:23 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 26 characters in body; edited title
|
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:17 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:35 | |||||
Jul 23, 2018 at 8:17 | history | asked | Gear | CC BY-SA 4.0 |