Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7, 2018 at 2:31 comment added user19475 @AlbertoMontina: $\mathbf{G}_a$ and $\mathbf{G}_m$ are not proper.
Nov 6, 2018 at 19:44 comment added Alm Concerning your answer, there is something that I didn’t get. Algebraic groups can be built also on curves with genus 0, whereas you end up with g=1. For example, a line has a natural group where the group law is given by summing each coordinate (provided that line passes through the origin). What did I miss?
Jul 24, 2018 at 22:40 vote accept Alm
Jul 23, 2018 at 20:22 vote accept Alm
Jul 24, 2018 at 22:40
Jul 21, 2018 at 7:42 history edited user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jul 19, 2018 at 10:50 history edited user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 22 characters in body
Jul 19, 2018 at 9:48 comment added user19475 I think you're right: One needs properness since $\mathrm{H}^i_c(\mathbf{G}_a,\mathbf{Q}_\ell)$ is non-trivial only in dimension $i = 2$.
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:37 history edited user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 27 characters in body
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:34 comment added Francesco Polizzi It seems to me that the topological formula $\chi(G)=2g-2$ only works over $\mathbb{Q}$ and in the proper case.
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:29 history edited user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:19 comment added user19475 Is there also a Lefschetz fixed point formula for étale cohomology with compact supports? Then one could drop the assumption "proper".
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:14 history edited user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jul 19, 2018 at 8:12 history answered user19475 CC BY-SA 4.0