Timeline for Description of Shapiro lemma by cochain
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 17, 2018 at 7:41 | comment | added | Pierre | @Qixiao : you have to take a transversal for $H$ in $G$... again, the details are in NSW, Cohomology of Number Fields. By the way, the isomorphism the other way around is easy: Shapiro's isomorphism is the restriction from $G$ to $H$, followed by the map $N\to M$ which evaluates at 1 -- thinking of the induced module as $Hom_{\mathbb{Z}H}( \mathbb{Z} G, M)$. | |
Jul 15, 2018 at 20:35 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 18, 2018 at 20:44 | |||||
Jul 15, 2018 at 20:24 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | See also the exercise in Chapter III.8 of Ken Brown's "Cohomology of Groups". | |
Jul 15, 2018 at 14:44 | comment | added | user39380 | @TKe Thanks for the reference, I’ll try to work out the details! One thing a bit confusing, if we are constructing the reverse map $H^i(H,M)\to H^i(G,N)$, then a cocycle $H^i\to M$ can associate a cocycle $H^i\to N$ by inclusion, but then how does it extends to a cocycle on $G^i$? | |
Jul 15, 2018 at 14:28 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Schapiro --> Shapiro
|
Jul 15, 2018 at 14:27 | history | edited | user39380 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Jul 15, 2018 at 13:49 | comment | added | user19475 | See Cohomology of Number Fields, (1.6.4). | |
Jul 15, 2018 at 13:22 | history | asked | user39380 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |