Timeline for Why are people interested in defining GW invariant in algebraic geometry category
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 at 8:47 | comment | added | Barbara | Maybe my answer to your question on functoriality of virtual fundamental classes might provide an example. Usually anything that can be proven using algebraic techniques can also be proven by symplectic techniques, and conversely. In my opinion it's not a bug, but a feature, which allows everyone to choose the language they're more comfortable with. | |
| Jul 6, 2010 at 3:42 | comment | added | HYYY | Hi,but is there any example that we use algebraic GW theory to solve something in symplectic category? For example,how can we use virtual localization technique to solve something in symplectic geometry that we generally can't solve using symplectic geometry techniques? | |
| Jul 5, 2010 at 8:09 | history | answered | Barbara | CC BY-SA 2.5 |