I've often idly wondered one can say about the collection of "growth rates". By growth rate, let's say we mean an equivalence class of functions (0,infty) \to (0,\infty)$(0,\infty) \to (0,\infty)$, where two functions f_1$f_1$,f_2 $f_2$ are equivalent if f_1/f_2$f_1/f_2$ and f_2/f_1$f_2/f_1$ are bounded away from 0$0$ and infinity. You can add, and multiply them, and they form a poset under the pordering where f_1 <= f_2$f_1 \le f_2$ if f_1/f_2$f_1/f_2$ is bounded above.
So, in loose terms, does the sequence xlog(1+x)$x\log(1+x)$, xlog(log(10+x))$x\log(\log(10+x))$, xlog(log(log(100+x)))$x\log(\log(\log(100+x)))$, ... convergeconverges to x$x$ in some natural way? With a little thought you can construct a growth rate which is strictly greater than x$x$ and strictly less than all growth rates in that sequence, so it probably no. Still is there any sort of natural "topology"? Can you find a directed set of growth rates which are linearly ordered, and eventually smaller than anything larger than x$x$?
There's probably a better way to look at this (which is why I ask). =)